Palmer v. . Litherland

1 N.C. 748
Court of King's Bench·Decided July 5, 1793·Published

Opinions

When I was in the Common Bench, a question came before us, whether an administrator durante minore aetate, who wastes the goods, shall be charged after the infant comes of age. In 6 Rep., Packman's case, it is agreed that he shall be charged without saying how; and afterwards in the Common Bench, that he shall be charged as executor de son tort.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palmer v. . Litherland, 1 N.C. 748 (kingsbench 1793).

1 N.C. 748 (Palmer v. . Litherland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.