Palmer v. . Litherland
1 N.C. 748
This text of 1 N.C. 748 (Palmer v. . Litherland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Palmer v. . Litherland, 1 N.C. 748 (kingsbench 1793).
Opinions
When I was in the Common Bench, a question came before us, whether an administrator durante minore aetate, who wastes the goods, shall be charged after the infant comes of age. In 6 Rep., Packman's case, it is agreed that he shall be charged without saying how; and afterwards in the Common Bench, that he shall be charged as executor de son tort.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-litherland-kingsbench-1793.