Palmer v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
This text of 148 Misc. 324 (Palmer v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The present policy had the provision that it was incontestable after it had been in force “ during the lifetime of the insured ” for two years, etc. Here the insured died in less than thirteen months after the issuance of the policy. It was error, therefore, to hold that it was incontestable. The case of Killian v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (251 N. Y. 44) involved a policy which did not include the words “ during the lifetime of the insured,” and is not controlling.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Levy, Callahan and Untermyer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 Misc. 324, 265 N.Y.S. 796, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-john-hancock-mutual-life-insurance-nyappterm-1933.