Palmer v. Howard

Nebraska Supreme Court

Palmer v. Howard

78 N.W. 514, 58 Neb. 264, 1899 Neb. LEXIS 153

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 8, 1899

DocketNo. 8781

StatusPublished

This text of 78 N.W. 514 (Palmer v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palmer v. Howard, 78 N.W. 514, 58 Neb. 264, 1899 Neb. LEXIS 153 (Neb. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Ragan, C.

Hiram J. Palmer, administrator, has filed a petition in error here for the review of a judgment pronounced against him in favor of De Witt C. Howard by the district court of Hall county. The record presents no question of law. It is insisted by counsel for plaintiff in error that the evidence does not sustain the verdict of the jury. The evidence is not very satisfactory, but we are compelled to say that we think it sustains the jury’s verdict, and the judgment must be, and is,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ragan, C.

Hiram J. Palmer, administrator, has filed a petition in error here for the review of a judgment pronounced against him in favor of De Witt C. Howard by the district court of Hall county. The record presents no question of law. It is insisted by counsel for plaintiff in error that the evidence does not sustain the verdict of the jury. The evidence is not very satisfactory, but we are compelled to say that we think it sustains the jury’s verdict, and the judgment must be, and is,

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 N.W. 514, 58 Neb. 264, 1899 Neb. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-howard-neb-1899.