Palmer v. Horton
1 Johns. Cas. 27
Opinion
without hearing an argument, gave judgment for the demandant, and said they had frequently de[*28] cided, *in this court that the forfeiture of the estate of the husband, in pursuance of the act above mentioned, .did not forfeit the wife’s right of dower.
Judgment for demandant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Palmer v. Horton, 1 Johns. Cas. 27 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
1 Johns. Cas. 27 (Palmer v. Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hogle v. Stewart
8 Johns. 104 (New York Supreme Court, 1811)