Palmer v. Horton
1 Johns. Cas. 27
This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 27 (Palmer v. Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Palmer v. Horton, 1 Johns. Cas. 27 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
Opinion
without hearing an argument, gave judgment for the demandant, and said they had frequently de[*28] cided, *in this court that the forfeiture of the estate of the husband, in pursuance of the act above mentioned, .did not forfeit the wife’s right of dower.
Judgment for demandant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hogle v. Stewart
8 Johns. 104 (New York Supreme Court, 1811)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Johns. Cas. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-horton-nysupct-1799.