Palmer v. Einsetler
187 A.D. 890
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1919
StatusPublished
This text of 187 A.D. 890 (Palmer v. Einsetler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Palmer v. Einsetler, 187 A.D. 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, upon the authority of Palmer v. Scheftel (183 App. Div. 77). Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Merrell, JJ ; Laughlin, J., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Palmer v. Scheftel
183 A.D. 77 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
187 A.D. 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-einsetler-nyappdiv-1919.