Palmer v. E. P. Bailey & Co.
54 N.Y.S. 1111
Opinion
No opinion. Judgment and order reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Held, that it was error to receive evidence of the pecuniary standing of the defendant. See Enos v. Enos, 58 Hun, 45,11 N. Y. Supp. 415, affirmed 135 N. Y. 609, 32 N. E. 123; 47 N. Y. Supp. 468.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Palmer v. E. P. Bailey & Co., 54 N.Y.S. 1111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).
54 N.Y.S. 1111 (Palmer v. E. P. Bailey & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Enos v. . Enos
32 N.E. 123 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Enos v. Enos
11 N.Y.S. 415 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Palmer v. E. P. Bailey & Co.
47 N.Y.S. 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)