Palmer v. Duncanson

254 Mass. 494
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 26, 1926·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Couet.

The question reported is whether a proper basis had been laid for the admission of secondary evidence as to the contents of books of account. The preliminary finding of the judge to the effect that there was such basis was amply justified by testimony which need not be narrated. Smith v. Brown, 151 Mass. 338. Whitney v. Lynch, 222 Mass. 112, 116. The case is distinguishable from Post v. Leland, 184 Mass. 601.

Judgments to be entered on the verdicts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palmer v. Duncanson, 254 Mass. 494 (Mass. 1926).

254 Mass. 494 (Palmer v. Duncanson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fauci v. Mulready
150 N.E.2d 286 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1958)