Palmer v. Duncanson
254 Mass. 494
Opinion
The question reported is whether a proper basis had been laid for the admission of secondary evidence as to the contents of books of account. The preliminary finding of the judge to the effect that there was such basis was amply justified by testimony which need not be narrated. Smith v. Brown, 151 Mass. 338. Whitney v. Lynch, 222 Mass. 112, 116. The case is distinguishable from Post v. Leland, 184 Mass. 601.
Judgments to be entered on the verdicts.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Palmer v. Duncanson, 254 Mass. 494 (Mass. 1926).
254 Mass. 494 (Palmer v. Duncanson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fauci v. Mulready
150 N.E.2d 286 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1958)