Palmer v. Duncanson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Palmer v. Duncanson

254 Mass. 494

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedJanuary 26, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 Mass. 494 (Palmer v. Duncanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palmer v. Duncanson, 254 Mass. 494 (Mass. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Couet.

The question reported is whether a proper basis had been laid for the admission of secondary evidence as to the contents of books of account. The preliminary finding of the judge to the effect that there was such basis was amply justified by testimony which need not be narrated. Smith v. Brown, 151 Mass. 338. Whitney v. Lynch, 222 Mass. 112, 116. The case is distinguishable from Post v. Leland, 184 Mass. 601.

Judgments to be entered on the verdicts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Couet.

The question reported is whether a proper basis had been laid for the admission of secondary evidence as to the contents of books of account. The preliminary finding of the judge to the effect that there was such basis was amply justified by testimony which need not be narrated. Smith v. Brown, 151 Mass. 338. Whitney v. Lynch, 222 Mass. 112, 116. The case is distinguishable from Post v. Leland, 184 Mass. 601.

Judgments to be entered on the verdicts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 Mass. 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-duncanson-mass-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack