Palmer v. Donner

74 U.S. 541, 19 L. Ed. 99, 7 Wall. 541, 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1031
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 18, 1869·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*542 The. CHIEF .JUSTICE

delivered the opinion of the ec urt.,

The revisory jurisdiction of this court over the'judgments of State tribunals, is defined by the' twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act-of 1789.- .It is there provided thátthe' citation- must be signed by the chief justice, or judge,1- dr chancellor of the court rendering or passing the judgment or decree complained of,, or by a j.ustice of the Supreme Court of the United ^States. But the .citation in; the-casé before us, was signed by district judge. This was without authority of law; and'the citation was, therefore, without effect. The case therefore is not properly,in this court;.and thé writ, of error must be

Dismissed:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palmer v. Donner, 74 U.S. 541, 19 L. Ed. 99, 7 Wall. 541, 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1031 (1869).

74 U.S. 541 (Palmer v. Donner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports, 2000
Richardson v. Woodward
104 F. 873 (Fourth Circuit, 1900)