Palmer v. Davies

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Palmer v. Davies

591 So. 2d 237, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6681, 1991 WL 120812

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 10, 1991

DocketNos. 90-3170, 91-0210

StatusPublished

This text of 591 So. 2d 237 (Palmer v. Davies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palmer v. Davies, 591 So. 2d 237, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6681, 1991 WL 120812 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a timely appeal and cross appeal from a final judgment and amended final judgment awarding compensatory and punitive damages to the appellee.

We have considered all of the appellate points presented on both the main and cross appeal and find no reversible error demonstrated except as to the failure of the trial court to apportion the punitive damages between appellee and the Public Medical Assistance Trust Fund as provided in section 768.73(2), Florida Statutes (1989). That statute requires that punitive damages awarded to a party in a personal injury or wrongful death action be apportioned 40% to the claimant and 60% to the Public Medical Assistance Trust Fund. The parties concede the statute, if constitutional, is applicable here and agree that the constitutional question need not be reached in this case. However, if the Supreme Court of Florida subsequently determines the statute to be unconstitutional, the parties have agreed to comply with that judgment ruling.

We note that the amended appeal is from an amended judgment of the trial court apportioning the punitive damages award. However, the judgment was entered after the original judgment was on appeal to this court. Thus, the trial court was without jurisdiction, absent a relinquishment from this court.

Accordingly, the amended judgment is reversed for lack of jurisdiction in the trial court. The original judgment is affirmed in all respects except as to the award of punitive damages. As to said award the trial court is directed to modify the original judgment so as to comply with the aforementioned statutory requirement for apportionment.

DOWNEY, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a timely appeal and cross appeal from a final judgment and amended final judgment awarding compensatory and punitive damages to the appellee.

We have considered all of the appellate points presented on both the main and cross appeal and find no reversible error demonstrated except as to the failure of the trial court to apportion the punitive damages between appellee and the Public Medical Assistance Trust Fund as provided in section 768.73(2), Florida Statutes (1989). That statute requires that punitive damages awarded to a party in a personal injury or wrongful death action be apportioned 40% to the claimant and 60% to the Public Medical Assistance Trust Fund. The parties concede the statute, if constitutional, is applicable here and agree that the constitutional question need not be reached in this case. However, if the Supreme Court of Florida subsequently determines the statute to be unconstitutional, the parties have agreed to comply with that judgment ruling.

We note that the amended appeal is from an amended judgment of the trial court apportioning the punitive damages award. However, the judgment was entered after the original judgment was on appeal to this court. Thus, the trial court was without jurisdiction, absent a relinquishment from this court.

Accordingly, the amended judgment is reversed for lack of jurisdiction in the trial court. The original judgment is affirmed in all respects except as to the award of punitive damages. As to said award the trial court is directed to modify the original judgment so as to comply with the aforementioned statutory requirement for apportionment.

DOWNEY, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

591 So. 2d 237, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6681, 1991 WL 120812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-davies-fladistctapp-1991.