Palmer v. Cregg
This text of 264 A.D. 829 (Palmer v. Cregg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to strike out district attorney’s appearance for respondent denied. Motion to strike out answer of respondent denied. Petition dismissed, determination adjudging petitioner guilty of criminal contempt of court confirmed and order of commitment affirmed and all stays vacated. All concur. (Proceeding to review an order adjudging petitioner guilty of criminal contempt of court.) Present —■ Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 829, 35 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-cregg-nyappdiv-1942.