Palmer v. Bankers Trust Co.

121 S.E. 520, 31 Ga. App. 580, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 73
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 8, 1924
Docket14757
StatusPublished

This text of 121 S.E. 520 (Palmer v. Bankers Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palmer v. Bankers Trust Co., 121 S.E. 520, 31 Ga. App. 580, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 73 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. A transferee in possession of a promissory note properly transferred to him by the payee is presumably the owner and holder of the legal title thereof.

2. In a suit by the transferee against the maker, where the genuineness of the indorsement is not denied by the defendant, the note is properly admitted in evidence without proof of the execution of the indorsement.

3. Where -in such a suit the defendant admitted the execution of the note, and there was no evidence.in support of any legal defense, a verdict for the plaintiff was properly directed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenldns, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 S.E. 520, 31 Ga. App. 580, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-v-bankers-trust-co-gactapp-1924.