Palmer v. Allen

1 Conn. 100
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 15, 1814·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

From the constitution of this Court, and the established course of proceeding in analogous cases, a literal compliance with the terms of the mandate is impracticable ; but there will be no difficulty in carrying its object into effect. Let a judgment be entered here reversing the former judgment of the superior court, and the cause be remanded to that court, to be proceeded in conformably to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palmer v. Allen, 1 Conn. 100 (Colo. 1814).

1 Conn. 100 (Palmer v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ableman v. Booth
11 Wis. 498 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1859)