Palmer ex rel. Maher v. All Judges of the 19th Judicial Circuit
This text of 247 So. 2d 477 (Palmer ex rel. Maher v. All Judges of the 19th Judicial Circuit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the basis of the briefs, the Petition for Prohibition, and the response thereto, we conclude that the rule nisi was improvidently entered and the writ of prohibition must be denied. See Kent v. United States, 1966, 383 U.S. 541, 86 S.Ct. 1045, 1057, 16 L.Ed.2d 84, and State of Florida ex rel. Philip S. Shailer v. Booher, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 720, 722.
Prohibition is denied and the rule nisi discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 So. 2d 477, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-ex-rel-maher-v-all-judges-of-the-19th-judicial-circuit-fladistctapp-1971.