Palmer ex rel. Maher v. All Judges of the 19th Judicial Circuit
247 So. 2d 477, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6679
Opinion
On the basis of the briefs, the Petition for Prohibition, and the response thereto, we conclude that the rule nisi was improvidently entered and the writ of prohibition must be denied. See Kent v. United States, 1966, 383 U.S. 541, 86 S.Ct. 1045, 1057, 16 L.Ed.2d 84, and State of Florida ex rel. Philip S. Shailer v. Booher, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 720, 722.
Prohibition is denied and the rule nisi discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Palmer ex rel. Maher v. All Judges of the 19th Judicial Circuit, 247 So. 2d 477, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6679 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).
247 So. 2d 477 (Palmer ex rel. Maher v. All Judges of the 19th Judicial Circuit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kent v. United States
383 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1966)
State Ex Rel. Shailer v. Booher
241 So. 2d 720 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)