Palmer ex rel. Maher v. All Judges of the 19th Judicial Circuit

247 So. 2d 477, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6679
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 19, 1971
DocketNo. 71-56
StatusPublished

This text of 247 So. 2d 477 (Palmer ex rel. Maher v. All Judges of the 19th Judicial Circuit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palmer ex rel. Maher v. All Judges of the 19th Judicial Circuit, 247 So. 2d 477, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6679 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the briefs, the Petition for Prohibition, and the response thereto, we conclude that the rule nisi was improvidently entered and the writ of prohibition must be denied. See Kent v. United States, 1966, 383 U.S. 541, 86 S.Ct. 1045, 1057, 16 L.Ed.2d 84, and State of Florida ex rel. Philip S. Shailer v. Booher, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 720, 722.

Prohibition is denied and the rule nisi discharged.

CROSS, C. J., and REED and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kent v. United States
383 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1966)
State Ex Rel. Shailer v. Booher
241 So. 2d 720 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 So. 2d 477, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palmer-ex-rel-maher-v-all-judges-of-the-19th-judicial-circuit-fladistctapp-1971.