Palmcroft Development Co. v. City of Phoenix

51 P.2d 921, 46 Ariz. 400, 103 A.L.R. 811, 1935 Ariz. LEXIS 175
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided November 25, 1935·No. Civil No. 3458.·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

ROSS, J.

— The appellant has filed a motion in which we are asked to modify the direction for judgment in its favor so as to give it interest at the legal rate of 6 per cent, from the date the debt became due and payable, or at least from the date of the entry of judgment. The appellee city, although served with copy of the motion, does not resist it. The judgment therefore will be modified so as to allow interest at the legal rate of 6 per cent, from the date that the different loans became due and payable to the plaintiff and his assignors.

The contract stipulated that the loans were made to be repaid without interest and there was no obligation *401 to pay interest until the debts became due. After the debts became due and payable, under section 1883, Revised Code of 1928, they should bear interest at the legal rate.

The debt is a liquidated debt and under the general rule bears interest from the date it should have been paid. Where there is no agreement for interest, interest is allowed as damages for the withholding of the money from the creditor after it is due and is, we believe, universally fixed at the legal rate. 15 R. C. L. 3, § 2.

LOCKWOOD, C. J., and MoALISTER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palmcroft Development Co. v. City of Phoenix, 51 P.2d 921, 46 Ariz. 400, 103 A.L.R. 811, 1935 Ariz. LEXIS 175 (Ark. 1935).

51 P.2d 921 (Palmcroft Development Co. v. City of Phoenix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Imperial Litho/Graphics v. M.J. Enterprises
730 P.2d 245 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1986)
Fluor Corporation v. United States
405 F.2d 823 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
Hitching Post Lodge, Inc. v. Kerwin
420 P.2d 273 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1966)
City of Mesa v. Killingsworth
394 P.2d 410 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1964)
Town of Worland v. Odell & Johnson
329 P.2d 797 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1958)
Porter v. Eyer
294 P.2d 661 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1956)
Gustafson v. Rajkovich
263 P.2d 540 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1953)
Adams v. Bolin
247 P.2d 617 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1952)
Pioneer Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. Corporation Commission
123 P.2d 828 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1942)
City of Phoenix v. Kidd
94 P.2d 428 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1939)
Southwest Mines Development Co. v. Martignene
64 P.2d 1031 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1937)
Atlantic Commission Co. v. Noe
53 P.2d 1088 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1936)