Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Palma v. State

Palma v. State

783 So. 2d 1120, 2001 WL 252057
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 15, 2001·No. 1D01-385·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

783 So.2d 1120 (2001)

Raymond PALMA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D01-385.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 15, 2001.

Raymond Palma, pro se, appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In response to an order to show cause regarding the timeliness of his appeal, Raymond Palma argues he did not receive notice of entry of the order until after the time for timely filing a notice of appeal had passed. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction without prejudice to Palma's right to file a petition for belated appeal with this court which complies with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) (formerly Rule 9.140(j), see Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 780 So.2d 834 875 (Fla.2000)).

BARFIELD, C.J., ALLEN and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palma v. State, 783 So. 2d 1120, 2001 WL 252057 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

783 So. 2d 1120 (Palma v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. State
832 So. 2d 135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Bellinger v. State
816 So. 2d 182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Grant v. State
783 So. 2d 1120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)