Palma v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Palma v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

260 A.D.2d 640, 687 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4308

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 26, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D.2d 640 (Palma v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palma v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, 260 A.D.2d 640, 687 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4308 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, dated May 12, 1998, which sustained a determination of an Administrative Law Judge, dated December 12, 1997, which, after a hearing, found that the petitioner violated a provision of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, imposed a fine of $40, and revoked the petitioner’s driver’s license.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

There is substantial evidence upon the record that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1172 (a) (see generally, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, dated May 12, 1998, which sustained a determination of an Administrative Law Judge, dated December 12, 1997, which, after a hearing, found that the petitioner violated a provision of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, imposed a fine of $40, and revoked the petitioner’s driver’s license.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

There is substantial evidence upon the record that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1172 (a) (see generally, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 640, 687 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palma-v-new-york-state-department-of-motor-vehicles-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack