Palma v. Kilolo Kijakazi

District Court, W.D. Louisiana·Decided October 11, 2023·No. 6:22-cv-01295·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION CARLOS PALMA CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:22-CV-01295 VERSUS JUDGE DRELL KILOLO KIJAKAZI MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID J. AYO

JUDGMENT This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge David J. Ayo for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)! for additional proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein. More particularly, the ALJ shall consider the evidence the medical source statement from Dr. Ronald Miller in determining Claimant’s eligibility for disability benefits. □ Tt THUS, DONE AND SIGNED in chambers on this _/ fh day of October 2023.

DEE D. DRELL, SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1 A fourth sentence remand constitutes a final judgment that triggers the filing period for an EAJA fee application. Shalala v. Schaeffer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Freeman v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 552, 553 (5" Cir. 1993).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palma v. Kilolo Kijakazi, (W.D. La. 2023).

Palma v. Kilolo Kijakazi (Palma v. Kilolo Kijakazi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related