Palma-Maldonado v. Holder

342 F. App'x 327
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 13, 2009·No. No. 06-72449·Published

Opinion

[328] MEMORANDUM **

Jorge Carlos Palma-Maldonado, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his application for adjustment of status. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law in removal proceedings, Molina v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir.2002), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency properly concluded that Pal-ma-Maldonado was statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255 by virtue of overstaying his 1999 voluntary departure order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229e(d); Granados-Oseguera v. Mukasey, 546 F.3d 1011, 1016 (9th Cir.2008) (per curiam) (explaining that petitioner could no longer rely on “exceptional circumstances” to excuse failure to voluntarily depart). The agency also properly concluded that Perez-Gonzalez v. Ashcroft, 379 F.3d 783 (9th Cir.2004), did not waive the bar to adjustment of status for overstaying a voluntary departure order.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palma-Maldonado v. Holder, 342 F. App'x 327 (9th Cir. 2009).

342 F. App'x 327 (Palma-Maldonado v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Granados-Oseguera v. Mukasey
546 F.3d 1011 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)