Palm v. Cady

315 F.3d 1121
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 3, 2003·No. No. 01-56735·Published

Opinions

OPINION

CANBY, Circuit Judge.

We affirm the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, for reasons stated in its opinion, Palm v. Klapperman (In re Cady), 266 B.R. 172 (B.A.P.2001). We reprint that opinion as an appendix hereto.

AFFIRMED.

Opinion by Judge CANBY; Dissent by Judge BERZON.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palm v. Cady, 315 F.3d 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

315 F.3d 1121 (Palm v. Cady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Palm v. Klapperman (In Re Cady)
266 B.R. 172 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Watson v. City National Bank (In Re Watson)
78 B.R. 232 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)