Palm Beach Polo, Inc. v. The Village of Wellington

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 19-80435-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

PALM BEACH POLO, INC.,

Plaintiff, v.

THE VILLAGE OF WELLINGTON,

Defendant. _____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Tax Costs [DE 84], and the September 28, 2021 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge William Matthewman [DE 97] (the “Report”). The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 97] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 97] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 97] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning and conclusions. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 97] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Defendant’s Motion to Tax Costs [DE 84] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; 3. Defendant is entitled to costs in the amount of $1,954.60. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 13th day October, 2021. : “4 i} f J qememnaffl ve ea a3 v Py j ‘4 ta ase □□ C4 KAYA KYA MH GC< VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies furnished to: Counsel of record