Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. G & G Marine, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. G & G Marine, Inc.

889 So. 2d 173, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19110, 2004 WL 2896465

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 15, 2004

DocketNo. 4D04-701

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 889 So. 2d 173 (Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. G & G Marine, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. G & G Marine, Inc., 889 So. 2d 173, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19110, 2004 WL 2896465 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

SILVERMAN, SCOTT J., Associate Judge.

We affirm that portion of the trial court’s order granting injunctive relief against appellants for violating appellees’ easement for ingress and egress. See Blue Reef Holding Corp. v. Coyne, 645 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Held v. Held, 617 So.2d‘ 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). However, we reverse and remand that portion of the trial court’s order requiring [174]*174appellees to post an injunction bond of $1,000. We note that upon the trial court’s conclusion of the evidentiary hearing on the preliminary injunction, the court ordered appellees to post a $1,000 bond. Thereupon, the trial judge abruptly terminated the hearing without affording appellants an opportunity to object to the amount of the bond. As we stated in Offshore Marine Towing, Inc. v. Sea Tow Services International, Inc., 778 So.2d 510, 511 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), “[b]oth parties must be provided with the opportunity to present evidence regarding the appropriate amount of the injunction bond.”

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SILVERMAN, SCOTT J., Associate Judge.

We affirm that portion of the trial court’s order granting injunctive relief against appellants for violating appellees’ easement for ingress and egress. See Blue Reef Holding Corp. v. Coyne, 645 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Held v. Held, 617 So.2d‘ 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). However, we reverse and remand that portion of the trial court’s order requiring [174]*174appellees to post an injunction bond of $1,000. We note that upon the trial court’s conclusion of the evidentiary hearing on the preliminary injunction, the court ordered appellees to post a $1,000 bond. Thereupon, the trial judge abruptly terminated the hearing without affording appellants an opportunity to object to the amount of the bond. As we stated in Offshore Marine Towing, Inc. v. Sea Tow Services International, Inc., 778 So.2d 510, 511 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), “[b]oth parties must be provided with the opportunity to present evidence regarding the appropriate amount of the injunction bond.”

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

889 So. 2d 173, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19110, 2004 WL 2896465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palm-beach-polo-holdings-inc-v-g-g-marine-inc-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack