Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. v. Limbaugh
This text of 967 So. 2d 219 (Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. v. Limbaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Upon consideration, petitioner’s motion for leave to reply to respondent Rush Limbaugh’s response to petitioner’s motion to strike or, alternatively, motion to supplement motion to strike is hereby denied.
Petitioner’s motion to strike is hereby denied. Upon consideration of the petition for review and the response thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.
Upon consideration of respondent Rush Limbaugh’s motion for attorney’s fees and respondent Marta Miranda’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs, it is ordered that said motions are hereby denied.
COPE, C.J., and SUAREZ and CORTIÑAS, JJ., concur.
Before COPE, SUAREZ and CORTIÑAS, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
967 So. 2d 219, 2005 WL 5891933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palm-beach-newspapers-inc-v-limbaugh-fladistctapp-2005.