Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. v. Limbaugh

967 So. 2d 219, 2005 WL 5891933
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 2005·No. No. 3D05-1799·Published

Opinions

Upon consideration, petitioner’s motion for leave to reply to respondent Rush Limbaugh’s response to petitioner’s motion to strike or, alternatively, motion to supplement motion to strike is hereby denied.

Petitioner’s motion to strike is hereby denied. Upon consideration of the petition for review and the response thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

COPE, C.J., and SUAREZ and CORTIÑAS, JJ., concur.

Upon consideration of respondent Rush Limbaugh’s motion for attorney’s fees and respondent Marta Miranda’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs, it is ordered that said motions are hereby denied.

COPE, C.J., and SUAREZ and CORTIÑAS, JJ., concur.

Before COPE, SUAREZ and CORTIÑAS, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. v. Limbaugh, 967 So. 2d 219, 2005 WL 5891933 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

967 So. 2d 219 (Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. v. Limbaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. v. Burk
504 So. 2d 378 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc.
531 So. 2d 113 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
884 A.2d 981 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)
Friend v. Friend
866 So. 2d 116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Shields v. Flinn
528 So. 2d 967 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Tober v. Sanchez
417 So. 2d 1053 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
State v. City of Clearwater
863 So. 2d 149 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Med. Gen. Con., Inc. v. Chief Judge of Thir. Jud. Circuit
840 So. 2d 1008 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Smithwick v. TELEVISION 12
730 So. 2d 795 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation
333 F. Supp. 2d 333 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2004)
Davis v. Cincinnati Enquirer
840 N.E.2d 1150 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)