Palm Beach Heights Development & Sales Corp. v. Loden

417 So. 2d 320, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28858
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 28, 1982·No. No. 81-1683·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having duly considered all of the arguments raised by the parties, we are of the opinion that the only error committed by the trial court was the award of costs to appellee without motion or supporting affidavit. See Burnett v. Burnett, 197 So.2d 854 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967). Accordingly, we affirm the final judgment except as to the award of costs, which we reverse and remand for consideration upon the filing of such motion and affidavit.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palm Beach Heights Development & Sales Corp. v. Loden, 417 So. 2d 320, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28858 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

417 So. 2d 320 (Palm Beach Heights Development & Sales Corp. v. Loden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dean Witter & Co. v. Polisar
443 So. 2d 311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)