Palm Beach County v. Town of Jupiter

Florida Circuit Courts

Palm Beach County v. Town of Jupiter

48 Fla. Supp. 2d 64

CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

DecidedJune 3, 1991

DocketCase No. AP 90-1789 AY (Consolidated)

StatusPublished

This text of 48 Fla. Supp. 2d 64 (Palm Beach County v. Town of Jupiter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palm Beach County v. Town of Jupiter, 48 Fla. Supp. 2d 64 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Town of Jupiter enacted Ordinance Nos. 59-89, 60-89, and 61-89 annexing certain lands of unincorporated Palm Beach County. [65]*65Petitioners contend Jupiter failed to meet the requirements for annexation set forth in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes, as to compactness and contiguity.

The annexation here is a classic example of point-to-point or comer-to-comer abutment. “Contiguous,” when used in the context of municipal annexation has been defined as “touching or adjoining in a reasonably substantial sense.” See City of Sanford v Seminole County, 538 So.2d 113, 115 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); May v Lee, 483 So.2d 481, 482 n.1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

We find the annexation is not substantially coterminous with a part of the boundary of the Town of Jupiter. Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is GRANTED and Ordinance Nos. 59-89, 60-89, and 61-89 are hereby quashed. RODGERS, RAPP and OFTEDAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI