Palm Beach County v. Town of Jupiter

48 Fla. Supp. 2d 64
Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida·Decided June 3, 1991·No. Case No. AP 90-1789 AY (Consolidated)·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Town of Jupiter enacted Ordinance Nos. 59-89, 60-89, and 61-89 annexing certain lands of unincorporated Palm Beach County. [65] Petitioners contend Jupiter failed to meet the requirements for annexation set forth in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes, as to compactness and contiguity.

The annexation here is a classic example of point-to-point or comer-to-comer abutment. “Contiguous,” when used in the context of municipal annexation has been defined as “touching or adjoining in a reasonably substantial sense.” See City of Sanford v Seminole County, 538 So.2d 113, 115 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); May v Lee, 483 So.2d 481, 482 n.1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

We find the annexation is not substantially coterminous with a part of the boundary of the Town of Jupiter. Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is GRANTED and Ordinance Nos. 59-89, 60-89, and 61-89 are hereby quashed. RODGERS, RAPP and OFTEDAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palm Beach County v. Town of Jupiter, 48 Fla. Supp. 2d 64 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1991).

48 Fla. Supp. 2d 64 (Palm Beach County v. Town of Jupiter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Sanford v. Seminole County
538 So. 2d 113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
May v. Lee County
483 So. 2d 481 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)