Palm Avocet Holdings LLC v. RT Signal Corporation

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee rr eo eee eee eee eee x PALM AVOCET HOLDINGS LLC et al., : : ORDER DENYING MOTION Le : FOR RECONSIDERATION Plaintiffs, " -against- : 22 Cry. 4619 (AKH)

RT SIGNAL CORPORATION et al., Defendants. peepee nene ee ee ene nee eecenneene X ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: Defendant Kanen Flowers, proceeding pro se, moves the Court to reconsider 1) the default judgment against the corporate defendants for failure to retain counsel and 2) the adoption of the civil case management plan. ECF No. 88. First, as an individual defendant, Defendant does not have standing to contest the default judgment. See Great Am. Audio Corp. v. Metacom, Inc., 938 F.2d 16, 19 (2d Cir.1991), Second, Defendant articulates no reasons why the case management plan is deficient. See Shrader v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 70 ¥.3d 255 (2d Cir. 1995). Finally, the motion fails to comply with standard procedural requirements, such as Local Civil Rule 7.1(a)(1). Therefore, the motion is denied. The Clerk shall terminate ECF Nos. 88 and 98.

SO ORDERED. J KE fe. 4, vo Dated: August 21, 2024 [Re bee et ey _ New York, New York ALVIN K, HELLERSTEIN ee United States District Judge