Pallida, LLC, Successor in Interest of Dodeka, LLC v. Andrea D. Smith and Frost Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 20, 2020·No. 02-19-00075-CV·Published

Opinion

In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00075-CV

PALLIDA, LLC, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST OF DODEKA, LLC, Appellant V.

ANDREA D. SMITH AND FROST BANK, Appellees

On Appeal from the 43rd District Court Parker County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV18-0758

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Womack, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT We have considered appellant’s “Unopposed Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice.” We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: February 20, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pallida, LLC, Successor in Interest of Dodeka, LLC v. Andrea D. Smith and Frost Bank, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Pallida, LLC, Successor in Interest of Dodeka, LLC v. Andrea D. Smith and Frost Bank (Pallida, LLC, Successor in Interest of Dodeka, LLC v. Andrea D. Smith and Frost Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.