Pallas v. Ratkoff
239 A.D. 759, 263 N.Y.S. 1020
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1933
StatusPublished
This text of 239 A.D. 759 (Pallas v. Ratkoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pallas v. Ratkoff, 239 A.D. 759, 263 N.Y.S. 1020 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
— Judgments and order affirmed, with separate bills of''costs. All concur, except. [760]*760Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for .reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial as to the defendant Oelheim only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
239 A.D. 759, 263 N.Y.S. 1020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pallas-v-ratkoff-nyappdiv-1933.