Pallas v. City of Rome
269 A.D.2d 784, 705 N.Y.S.2d 481, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1669
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 16, 2000
StatusPublished
This text of 269 A.D.2d 784 (Pallas v. City of Rome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pallas v. City of Rome, 269 A.D.2d 784, 705 N.Y.S.2d 481, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Buckley, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Buckley, J. — Dismiss Pleading.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Hurlbutt, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 784, 705 N.Y.S.2d 481, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pallas-v-city-of-rome-nyappdiv-2000.