Palladino v. Turner
263 So. 2d 206, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3594
Opinion
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus, the brief of petitioner, and the return of the respondent, we conclude that the alternative writ should be discharged without prejudice. Petitioner [207]*207may reapply for bail pending appeal in accord with the standards enunciated in Younghans v. State, 90 So.2d 308 (Fla.1956) and F.A.R. 6.15(b), 32 F.S.A.; however, on reapplication petitioner remains subject to existing statutory limitations on bail, including Fla.Stat. § 903.132, F.S.A., as may be applicable.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Palladino v. Turner, 263 So. 2d 206, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3594 (Fla. 1972).
263 So. 2d 206 (Palladino v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Jimenez
508 So. 2d 1257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Hart v. State
405 So. 2d 1048 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Bamber v. State
300 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)