Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Palladino v. Turner

Palladino v. Turner

263 So. 2d 206, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3594
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 7, 1972
DocketNo. 42120
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 263 So. 2d 206 (Palladino v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palladino v. Turner, 263 So. 2d 206, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3594 (Fla. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus, the brief of petitioner, and the return of the respondent, we conclude that the alternative writ should be discharged without prejudice. Petitioner [207]*207may reapply for bail pending appeal in accord with the standards enunciated in Younghans v. State, 90 So.2d 308 (Fla.1956) and F.A.R. 6.15(b), 32 F.S.A.; however, on reapplication petitioner remains subject to existing statutory limitations on bail, including Fla.Stat. § 903.132, F.S.A., as may be applicable.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jimenez
508 So. 2d 1257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Hart v. State
405 So. 2d 1048 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Bamber v. State
300 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 So. 2d 206, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palladino-v-turner-fla-1972.