Palladino v. Dietz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Palladino v. Dietz

209 A.D.2d 391, 619 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11036

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 209 A.D.2d 391 (Palladino v. Dietz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palladino v. Dietz, 209 A.D.2d 391, 619 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11036 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered December 18, 1992 and (2) a judgment of the same court, dated February 26, 1993.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed for reasons stated by Justice Colabella at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI