Home/New York Supreme Court/Paliotto v. Hartman

Paliotto v. Hartman

9 Misc. 2d 963, 174 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2795
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 27, 1957
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 9 Misc. 2d 963 (Paliotto v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paliotto v. Hartman, 9 Misc. 2d 963, 174 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2795 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1957).

Opinion

George P. Stier, J.

Motion to dismiss the second cause of action against Sylvester Cosentino upon the ground that said action was barred by the Statute of Limitations. Inasmuch as the moving defendant under the second cause of action is an alleged conspirator with the other defendants to accomplish the wrong charged in the first cause of action (Green v. Davies, 83 App. Div. 216) he is united in interest with his coconspirators [964]*964within the meaning of section 16 of the Civil Pi-actice Act. His motion to dismiss the second cause of action as not having been commenced against him within the time limited by law is denied.

Submit order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greenfield v. Kanwit
87 F.R.D. 129 (S.D. New York, 1980)
Gross v. Newburger, Loeb & Co.
103 Misc. 2d 417 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Misc. 2d 963, 174 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paliotto-v-hartman-nysupct-1957.