Palillo v. Larson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Palillo v. Larson

54 A.D.2d 591, 386 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13962

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 3, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 591 (Palillo v. Larson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palillo v. Larson, 54 A.D.2d 591, 386 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, dated August 27, 1976 in Albany County, which granted petitioner’s application to validate his petition designating him as a candidate for the public office of State Senator, 57th Senatorial District, in a Democratic Party primary election. Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, dated September 3, 1976 in Albany County, which denied a [592]*592motion to vacate the judgment validating petitioner’s designating petition. We find the contentions'of appellants on these appeals unpersuasive. Judgment and order affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Mahoney, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, dated August 27, 1976 in Albany County, which granted petitioner’s application to validate his petition designating him as a candidate for the public office of State Senator, 57th Senatorial District, in a Democratic Party primary election. Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, dated September 3, 1976 in Albany County, which denied a [592]*592motion to vacate the judgment validating petitioner’s designating petition. We find the contentions'of appellants on these appeals unpersuasive. Judgment and order affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Mahoney, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 591, 386 N.Y.S.2d 826, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palillo-v-larson-nyappdiv-1976.