Palilla v. State

807 So. 2d 799, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2007, 2002 WL 265863
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 2002·No. No. 1D01-3229·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order, dated November 20, 2001, the show cause order is discharged, and the appeal shall proceed from the final order denying the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. However, as the appellant’s claim is both successive and without merit, we affirm. See Hipps v. State, 790 So.2d 583 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, PADOVANO, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palilla v. State, 807 So. 2d 799, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2007, 2002 WL 265863 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

807 So. 2d 799 (Palilla v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hipps v. State
790 So. 2d 583 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)