Paley v. Paley

595 So. 2d 315, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3903, 1992 WL 63115
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 1, 1992·No. No. 91-1706·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue meriting discussion is the trial court’s failure to set a termination date for the payment of rehabilitative alimony. Rehabilitative alimony can only be awarded for a finite period. Strollo v. Strollo, 365 So.2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Zilbert v. Zilbert, 287 So.2d 100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to conduct a hearing and specify a termination date for such an award.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paley v. Paley, 595 So. 2d 315, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3903, 1992 WL 63115 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

595 So. 2d 315 (Paley v. Paley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zilbert v. Zilbert
287 So. 2d 100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Strollo v. Strollo
365 So. 2d 189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)