Paletz v. Riker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Paletz v. Riker

259 A.D. 839, 20 N.Y.S.2d 174, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6926

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 839 (Paletz v. Riker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paletz v. Riker, 259 A.D. 839, 20 N.Y.S.2d 174, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding in the nature of mandamus, contemplated by article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, instituted by petitioner, to procure an order directing the respondent, clerk of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, Fourth District, to enter a default judgment in an action wherein service of the summons was not personally made upon the defendants therein, but through substituted service thereof. Order denying petitioner’s application unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding in the nature of mandamus, contemplated by article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, instituted by petitioner, to procure an order directing the respondent, clerk of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, Fourth District, to enter a default judgment in an action wherein service of the summons was not personally made upon the defendants therein, but through substituted service thereof. Order denying petitioner’s application unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 839, 20 N.Y.S.2d 174, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paletz-v-riker-nyappdiv-1940.