Palethorp v. Palethorp
48 A. 269, 198 Pa. 395, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 799
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 18, 1901
DocketAppeal, No. 249
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 48 A. 269 (Palethorp v. Palethorp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Palethorp v. Palethorp, 48 A. 269, 198 Pa. 395, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 799 (Pa. 1901).
Opinion
A careful consideration of the defendant’s exhaustive argument against the plaintiff’s contention has not convinced us of error in the master’s report or in the decree entered by the court below. It follows as a natural and reasonable sequence that the decree should be affirmed.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kennedy v. Condran
90 A. 620 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
48 A. 269, 198 Pa. 395, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palethorp-v-palethorp-pa-1901.