Palethorp v. Palethorp
48 A. 269, 198 Pa. 395, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 799
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 18, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 249·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
A careful consideration of the defendant’s exhaustive argument against the plaintiff’s contention has not convinced us of error in the master’s report or in the decree entered by the court below. It follows as a natural and reasonable sequence that the decree should be affirmed.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Palethorp v. Palethorp, 48 A. 269, 198 Pa. 395, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 799 (Pa. 1901).
48 A. 269 (Palethorp v. Palethorp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kennedy v. Condran
90 A. 620 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)