Palethorp v. Palethorp

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Palethorp v. Palethorp

31 A. 917, 168 Pa. 102, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 762

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 13, 1895

DocketAppeal, No. 204

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 31 A. 917 (Palethorp v. Palethorp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palethorp v. Palethorp, 31 A. 917, 168 Pa. 102, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 762 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

While we do not regard the decree appealed from in this [105]*105case as a final decree, we are very clear that the common pleas has jurisdiction of the case and the parties. That court now possesses all the power of a court of equity in partition cases. We cannot now discuss the merits of the controversy, but we are of opinion that the plaintiff’s interest is sufficient to sustain a bill and that the rights of all the parties can be determined in the subsequent proceedings.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

While we do not regard the decree appealed from in this [105]*105case as a final decree, we are very clear that the common pleas has jurisdiction of the case and the parties. That court now possesses all the power of a court of equity in partition cases. We cannot now discuss the merits of the controversy, but we are of opinion that the plaintiff’s interest is sufficient to sustain a bill and that the rights of all the parties can be determined in the subsequent proceedings.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A. 917, 168 Pa. 102, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palethorp-v-palethorp-pa-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack