Palese v. Palese

101 A. 438, 29 Del. 584, 6 Boyce 584, 1917 Del. LEXIS 31
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedJune 14, 1917
DocketNo. 45
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 A. 438 (Palese v. Palese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palese v. Palese, 101 A. 438, 29 Del. 584, 6 Boyce 584, 1917 Del. LEXIS 31 (Del. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Rice, J.:

The court is of the opinion that, where the defense in an action for divorce is adultery on the part of the plaintiff, the better practice would be, and should be, to file an answer setting up the adulterous acts relied upon, with the same particularity as would be required in a petition alleging adultery as a ground for divorce. As the practice has been somewhat unsettled up to this time, we will give the defendant in this case reasonable opportunity to file an answer. If that can be done during the noon recess, the plaintiff may then elect whether he will proceed with the hearing or ask for a continuance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wiener v. Wiener
83 A.2d 749 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A. 438, 29 Del. 584, 6 Boyce 584, 1917 Del. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palese-v-palese-delsuperct-1917.