Palescandolo v. Mangione

33 A.D.2d 781, 307 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2670
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 8, 1969·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries by plaintiff wife and for loss of services and medical expenses by plaintiff husband, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 16,1969, which denied their application for a general preference. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and application granted. In view of the extent of the claimed special damages and of the fact that such claim is uncontroverted, it is our opinion that the jurisdictional monetary limitation of the Civil Court of the City of New York may preclude adequate recovery by plaintiffs in that court; hence, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the application for a preference. Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palescandolo v. Mangione, 33 A.D.2d 781, 307 N.Y.S.2d 182, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2670 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

33 A.D.2d 781 (Palescandolo v. Mangione) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D'Alessio v. Arias
81 A.D.2d 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Marrone v. Pathmark Supermarket
81 A.D.2d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)