Palen v. Bushnell
This text of 22 N.Y.S. 1044 (Palen v. Bushnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order appealed from was an order made by a judge out of court, and not by the court, under the title of the Code relating to proceedings supplementary to execution. By section 2433 it is provided that an order made in the course of a proceeding can be reviewed only as follows: .First, an order made by a judge out of court may be vacated or modified by the judge who made it, as if it was made in an action, or it, or the order of the judge vacating or modifying it, may be vacated or modified, upon motion, by the court out of which the execution was issued. If the appellants wished to review the order of Justice Beach they should have made a motion, on notice either to Justice Beach or to the court, to vacate that order, and from the order granted on that motion an appeal would lie; but we think no appeal could be taken until such motion was made. The appeal must therefore be dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 N.Y.S. 1044, 75 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 554, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 556, 68 Hun 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palen-v-bushnell-nysupct-1893.