Palco Investments Co. v. Springfield
This text of 767 N.E.2d 272 (Palco Investments Co. v. Springfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clark App. No. 2002CA22. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellants have not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due April 22, 2002, in compliance yith the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore have failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is dismissed, sua sponte.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
767 N.E.2d 272, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1440, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 1041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palco-investments-co-v-springfield-ohio-2002.