Palco Invest. Co. v. Springfield

764 N.E.2d 443, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1499, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 680
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 14, 2002
Docket02-404
StatusPublished

This text of 764 N.E.2d 443 (Palco Invest. Co. v. Springfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palco Invest. Co. v. Springfield, 764 N.E.2d 443, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1499, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 680 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

Clark App. No. 2002CA22. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellants’ motion for emergency alternative R.C. 2503.40 writ to stay enforcement pending appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, denied.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 N.E.2d 443, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1499, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palco-invest-co-v-springfield-ohio-2002.