Palazzolla v. City of New York

248 A.D.2d 250, 668 N.Y.S.2d 886, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2661
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 19, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, [251] New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered on or about April 11, 1996, which, in an action against defendant City for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff police officer when he tripped and fell on an allegedly defective sidewalk while attempting to apprehend a suspect, insofar as appealed from as limited by plaintiffs’ brief, denied plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint to add a cause of action under General Municipal Law § 205-e, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and leave to amend is granted.

As defendant concedes on constraint of Cosgriffv City of New York (241 AD2d 382), a cause of action under General Municipal Law § 205-e, as amended by chapter 703 of the Laws of 1996, can be based on defendant’s alleged violation of its duty under New York City Charter § 2903 (b) (2) to repair sidewalks.

Concur — Lerner, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Nardelli and Andidas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palazzolla v. City of New York, 248 A.D.2d 250, 668 N.Y.S.2d 886, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

248 A.D.2d 250 (Palazzolla v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCarthy v. City of New York
5 A.D.3d 445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Hayes v. City of New York
264 A.D.2d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)