Palazzola v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance

273 A.D. 856, 76 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4971
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 2, 1948·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Action on an insurance policy to recover a loss due to malicious mischief. Order denying defendant insurer’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action is barred because of the failure of plaintiffs to commence the action within twelve months after the happening of the loss, according to the terms of the policy, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. Defendant rejected the claim, at the latest, approximately one and one-half months before the expiration of the twelve-month period. No prejudice to plaintiffs resulted which could lead to a meritorious claim of waiver or estoppel. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palazzola v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance, 273 A.D. 856, 76 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4971 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

273 A.D. 856 (Palazzola v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dupuis v. Van Natten
61 A.D.2d 293 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Fotochrome, Inc. v. American Insurance
26 A.D.2d 634 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Chambers v. Glens Falls Insurance
41 Misc. 2d 727 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Skylark Enterprises Inc. v. American Central Insurance
13 A.D.2d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)