Palazzo v. Manassier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Palazzo v. Manassier

286 A.D.2d 460, 730 N.Y.S.2d 250, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8183

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 22, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 286 A.D.2d 460 (Palazzo v. Manassier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palazzo v. Manassier, 286 A.D.2d 460, 730 N.Y.S.2d 250, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8183 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate a petition for an opportunity to ballot by providing for write-in candidates in a primary election to be held on September 11, 2001, for the nomination of the Independence Party as its candidates for the public offices of Stony Point Town Supervisor and Member of the Town Council, Town of Stony Point, the appeals are from (1) an order of the [461]*461Supreme Court, Rockland County (O’Rourke, J.), dated August 7, 2001, and (2) a final order of the same court entered August 13, 2001.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant defaulted in appearing in the underlying proceeding. No appeal lies from a paper entered on the default of the appealing party (see, CPLR 5511; Matter of Lieberman v City of New York, Dept, of Hous. Preservation & Dev., 120 AD2d 730). Santucci, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate a petition for an opportunity to ballot by providing for write-in candidates in a primary election to be held on September 11, 2001, for the nomination of the Independence Party as its candidates for the public offices of Stony Point Town Supervisor and Member of the Town Council, Town of Stony Point, the appeals are from (1) an order of the [461]*461Supreme Court, Rockland County (O’Rourke, J.), dated August 7, 2001, and (2) a final order of the same court entered August 13, 2001.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant defaulted in appearing in the underlying proceeding. No appeal lies from a paper entered on the default of the appealing party (see, CPLR 5511; Matter of Lieberman v City of New York, Dept, of Hous. Preservation & Dev., 120 AD2d 730). Santucci, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D.2d 460, 730 N.Y.S.2d 250, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palazzo-v-manassier-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack