Palatine Insurance v. Barnes

124 So. 724, 98 Fla. 940
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 20, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 124 So. 724 (Palatine Insurance v. Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palatine Insurance v. Barnes, 124 So. 724, 98 Fla. 940 (Fla. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case was a companion case to that of The Citizens Insurance Company v. B. Barnes, C. H. Simpson, L. Carlson and the First National Bank of Milton. The cases were tried together. The records are identical except that they are based upon policies of insurance issued by different insurance companies. The law and the facts applicable to each case are identical.

The judgment in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion in the case of The Citizens Insurance Company, plaintiff in error, v. B. Barnes, C. H. Simpson, L. Carlson and First National Bank of Milton, defendants in error, filed at this term of the Court, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur in the opinion and judgment. Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 So. 724, 98 Fla. 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palatine-insurance-v-barnes-fla-1929.