Palamara v. Palamara

279 A.D.2d 559, 719 N.Y.S.2d 608, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 577
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 22, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 A.D.2d 559 (Palamara v. Palamara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Palamara v. Palamara, 279 A.D.2d 559, 719 N.Y.S.2d 608, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 577 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molía, J.), dated July 6, 1999, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for an award of maintenance and an attorney’s fee pendente lite.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as awarded the defendant an attorney’s fee pendente lite is dismissed as withdrawn; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court’s award of maintenance pendente lite was a reasonable accommodation between the plaintiffs means and the defendant’s needs, considering the parties’ preseparation standard of living (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6]). Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the parties’ conflicting allegations should be resolved at trial, when they can be fully explored (see, Wolfson v Wolfson, 272 AD2d 470). Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campanaro v. Campanaro
292 A.D.2d 330 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D.2d 559, 719 N.Y.S.2d 608, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palamara-v-palamara-nyappdiv-2001.