Palacz v. Palacz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Palacz v. Palacz

217 A.D.2d 1013, 631 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8492

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 14, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 217 A.D.2d 1013 (Palacz v. Palacz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Palacz v. Palacz, 217 A.D.2d 1013, 631 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8492 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for permission to appeal as poor person and for assignment of counsel denied and appeal dismissed. Memorandum: The order sought to be appealed recites that it was entered upon stipulation of the parties. Thus, no appeal lies because petitioner is not aggrieved (see, CPLR 5511; Town of Massena v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 45 NY2d 482, 488; Matter of Brown v Starkweather, 197 AD2d 840, lv denied 82 NY2d 653). Present—Pine, J. P., Law-ton, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for permission to appeal as poor person and for assignment of counsel denied and appeal dismissed. Memorandum: The order sought to be appealed recites that it was entered upon stipulation of the parties. Thus, no appeal lies because petitioner is not aggrieved (see, CPLR 5511; Town of Massena v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 45 NY2d 482, 488; Matter of Brown v Starkweather, 197 AD2d 840, lv denied 82 NY2d 653). Present—Pine, J. P., Law-ton, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 A.D.2d 1013, 631 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/palacz-v-palacz-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack