Palacio v. New York State Department of Correctional Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Palacio v. New York State Department of Correctional Services

12 A.D.3d 994, 784 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14301

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 24, 2004·Published

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to, this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

[995] Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating facility correspondence procedures after he attempted to send a personal letter through the legal mail at the prison where he was incarcerated. He was found guilty of this charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing, and the determination was upheld on administrative appeal. He then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging it.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with petitioner’s admission that he drafted the letter and attempted to send it through the legal mail to a physician at her residence address, constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Jackson v Portuondo, 288 AD2d 733, 733-734 [2001]; Matter of Fitzpatrick v Goord, 269 AD2d 643, 644 [2000]). Petitioner’s explanation concerning the personal references in the letter presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Jackson v Portuondo, 242 AD2d 809, 809 [1997]). His procedural and constitutional claims were unpreserved or lacking in merit (see Matter of Cummings v Goord, 10 AD3d 748, 749 [2004]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to, this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

[995] Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating facility correspondence procedures after he attempted to send a personal letter through the legal mail at the prison where he was incarcerated. He was found guilty of this charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing, and the determination was upheld on administrative appeal. He then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging it.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with petitioner’s admission that he drafted the letter and attempted to send it through the legal mail to a physician at her residence address, constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Jackson v Portuondo, 288 AD2d 733, 733-734 [2001]; Matter of Fitzpatrick v Goord, 269 AD2d 643, 644 [2000]). Petitioner’s explanation concerning the personal references in the letter presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Jackson v Portuondo, 242 AD2d 809, 809 [1997]). His procedural and constitutional claims were unpreserved or lacking in merit (see Matter of Cummings v Goord, 10 AD3d 748, 749 [2004]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Palacio v. New York State Department of Correctional Services, 12 A.D.3d 994, 784 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

12 A.D.3d 994 (Palacio v. New York State Department of Correctional Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related