Palacio v. Luckstone

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided July 12, 2023·No. Civil Action No. 2022-2800·Published

Opinion

AO 450 (Rev. 01/09; DC-03/10) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the District of Columbia MAURO C. PALACIO ) Plaintiff ) Vv, ) Civil Action No. 22cv2800 CHARLOTTE M. LUCKSTONE ) Defendant )

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one):

Othe plaintiff (name) recover from the defendant (name) __ the amount of

_ dollars($ ==——_), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of —__ %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of %, along with costs.

© the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

A other: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED and Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental * Pleading be DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

This action was (check one):

C1 tried by ajury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.

1 tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached.

a decided by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on a motion

to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Date: JU {2, 2072 ANGELA D. CAESAR, CLERK OF COURT (2 7 SDNIANTHA (ALLWNAY

fe Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Palacio v. Luckstone, (D.D.C. 2023).

Palacio v. Luckstone (Palacio v. Luckstone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.